Reform under fire for remote job listings after Farage vows to end home working and introduce Musk

Reform UK is facing accusations of double standards after listing work from home (WFH) vacancies, despite Nigel Farage’s outspoken support of returning to office.

In a BBC Breakfast interview, Farage warned that remote workers “all better really be seeking alternative careers very, very quickly”, after the party took control of 10 local authorities last week in unprecedented local election results.

Nevertheless, the party is currently hiring for nine jobs offering home working, including a regional director role with the working location described as ‘home working with occasional travel’.

Managing the attendance, absence and wellbeing of remote workers

Remote working creating generation unaccustomed to ‘proper work’, says Lord Rose – does HR agree?

Working remotely or in the office – do employees have a choice?

Farage has previously expressed admiration for Elon Musk’s department of government efficiency (Doge), which focuses on cutting federal spending. Farage promised radical changes claiming there would be “no more working from home” and “increased productivity from staff”, criticising the council’s “overeach” into issues such as diversity initiatives. “If you’re a DEI officer I suggest you look for another job,” he told the BBC, arguing that “every county needs a Doge”.

However, do Reform’s contradictions signal a wider issue around a lack of consistent messaging when it comes to WFH policies?

Amanda Arrowsmith, people director at the CIPD, told People Management consistency between internal policies and messaging from senior leaders is “vital” for building trust among employees and “fostering a transparent work environment where everyone knows what’s expected of them”.

Emma Cromarty, director of EC Human Resources, agreed, emphasising that when “leaders’ words align with company action, especially around sensitive topics like remote work it reinforces credibility and shows the organisation operates with integrity and transparency”.

How clashing policies can undermine staff confidence

Arrowsmith explained that conflicting messages can “affect employee engagement and trust in leadership decisions”, adding: “It can also mean a lack of clarity for line managers and may result in inconsistent practices or instances of ‘hushed hybrid’ – where managers quietly allow some employees to work from home, contrary to company policy”.

Kate Maddison-Greenwell, CEO of People Efficient, further reiterated that when companies suddenly shift their position on WFH, not only does this “erode trust for employees” it also “damages the inclusivity of teams”.

“Backtracking on these policies during recruitment will shrink the pool of talent amongst candidates and narrow the diversity of perspectives within your teams. When flexible working is granted to some but not others, or treated as a benefit to be earned, it fosters a work environment that is inequitable and unsafe,” she said.

Lucy Fitzgerald, CEO of Fitzgerald HR agreed, noting that employees may disregard fundamental policies if they see conflicting messaging and backtracking, leading to a “lack of trust in leaderships’ ability to lead”.

Labour MP Stella Creasy who has advocated for WFH policies and criticised Farage for “declaring war on family life not waste” said the hypocrisy of the job advert was “glorious”, in a post on X.

She previously wrote on X in response to Farage: “Working from home helps people balance work and family life. It's linked to higher productivity and better staff wellbeing as well as retention. From a man who is rarely in his own workplace, this is self-defeating. For communities whose services will be hit, it's a nightmare.”

Joeli Brearley, founder of Pregnant then Screwed, also wrote on LinkedIn: “For people like Farage, the office is not just a place of work. It’s a symbol. A place where hierarchy is visible. Where ties and titles still mean something.

“Meanwhile, back in the real world, Farage knows full well that refusing remote work will cripple his ability to hire competent people, not to mention dent overall productivity.”

Why flexible working remains a key priority for employees

Survey findings consistently highlight the strong preference among employees for flexible work arrangements. According to research from Buffer, 98 per cent of people would like to work remotely at least some of the time, with 91 per cent reporting a positive experience with remote work.

A recent Forbes advisor poll of 1,100 respondents also found 63 per cent worked remotely either all or some of the time.

Additionally, Barnett Waddingham found more than one in 10 (11 per cent) of workers aged 18–24 said flexible working was the most impactful potential improvement for them.

“With nearly 1 million young people currently not in education, employment or training, flexibility could be key to re-engaging this generation and guiding them into sustainable work,” said Julia Turney, head of platform and benefits at Barnett Waddingham, adding that the “polarising issue is becoming a core tenant of the war for great talent”.

“Flexible working is not a perk, it is a crucial offering to ensure equal opportunities for people with disabilities, neurodivergent people, parents, people with caring responsibilities and people dealing with chronic illness,” Maddison-Greenwell argued, adding that flexible working removes barriers which will increase productivity, not hinder it.

Arrowsmith urged organisations to carefully consider the impact that requiring people to return to the office full-time could have on employees, organisational culture and performance. She noted that whether an employer can enforce a return to office depends on the terms of individual contracts, and if employees are on a remote or flexible working contract then both parties should agree to the variation.

“Any changes to policy and practice should only be made after consultation and careful consideration of the potential benefits and drawbacks. Employers should communicate the change of policy and its rationale with plenty of notice, so people can make timely decisions about any arrangements they'll need to make, for example commuting or childcare,” she advised.

How HR can help navigate conflicting leadership messages

Maddison-Greenwell explained that the role of HR when senior leaders give conflicting messaging is to ensure that communication remains consistent.

“It's not only the change in messaging itself that erodes trust, but moreover the lack of clarity on what caused the change. HR leaders can protect relationships and engagement with employees by stepping in to clarify why leadership's position or message has changed, acknowledging the impact that may have and giving space for comment and feedback,” she said.

“When consistency waivers, transparency and open dialogue becomes exponentially more important,” she warned.

Fitzgerald added that HR leaders can support with gentle but clear messaging to help maintain “wider workforce trust”. “HR should clearly reinforce what is expected of employees when messaging from leadership may appear contradictory, as will allowing employees an avenue to express any concerns they may have around the conflicting messaging,” she emphasised.

For further information, read the CIPD’s guide to getting the most from remote working