Artificial Intelligence And Global Security
ABSTRACT: The rapid development of artificial intelligence has produced two barely controlled AI races, one between around a handful of companies, and the other between two superpowers. Neither race is in any meaningful sense regulated, so that the only constraints are financial and physical. The U.S. government has resisted state initiatives and punted responsibility to Congress. There is little sign of an AI arms control agreement between the United States and China. Growing public disquiet would appear to anticipate adverse consequences, such as unemployment, that have yet to materialize and may not. Yet there are good reasons to fear the unintended consequences of the two unfettered races. Drawing parallels with events in the late 1950s and early 1960s, when roughly comparable races occurred in the domains of prohibited narcotics and nuclear weapons, this paper argues for a rapid transition to a new détente based on AI arms control. A reduction of breakneck competition between the superpowers would reduce the need for mafia-like behavior by the leading U.S. companies.
Related Stories
AI News
64 percent of online shoppers are using AI to help find products, study shows
20 minutes ago
AI News
Federal judge rules for Anthropic in Pentagon dispute, nullifies government supply chain risk designation
20 minutes ago
AI News
Colorado Unveils New Proposed Rules Implementing Revamped AI Act
20 minutes ago
AI News
‘ChatGPT is not judging you’: Indians turn to AI gurus for answers
20 minutes ago
AI News
Alpha School wants AI to teach a billion kids. Should it?
1 hour ago
AI News
OPM memo pushes agencies to speed up hiring with AI
2 hours ago
AI News
Watching Your Wallet: Using AI to help you save money and budget
2 hours ago
AI News
Artificial Intelligence and the Enlightenment: Foucault’s Unfinished Question
2 hours ago