Artificial Intelligence And Global Security
ABSTRACT: The rapid development of artificial intelligence has produced two barely controlled AI races, one between around a handful of companies, and the other between two superpowers. Neither race is in any meaningful sense regulated, so that the only constraints are financial and physical. The U.S. government has resisted state initiatives and punted responsibility to Congress. There is little sign of an AI arms control agreement between the United States and China. Growing public disquiet would appear to anticipate adverse consequences, such as unemployment, that have yet to materialize and may not. Yet there are good reasons to fear the unintended consequences of the two unfettered races. Drawing parallels with events in the late 1950s and early 1960s, when roughly comparable races occurred in the domains of prohibited narcotics and nuclear weapons, this paper argues for a rapid transition to a new détente based on AI arms control. A reduction of breakneck competition between the superpowers would reduce the need for mafia-like behavior by the leading U.S. companies.
Related Stories
AI News
Bill Gross bets AI can help mass
1 week ago
AI News
Nigeria records 93% rise in AI micro
1 week ago
AI News
The Italian gelato maker using AI to invent new flavours
1 week ago
AI News
Closing the Gap Between Agentic CX Pilots and Production
1 week ago
AI News
New Brunswick data centre debate highlights cross
1 week ago
AI News
How to Structure an AI Agent Referral Fee Agreement Between Startups
1 week ago
AI News
No, AI didn’t delete a Swedish reality TV series
1 week ago
AI News
There is no AI in Armageddon. Artificial intelligence is a tool, not an apocalypse
1 week ago