‘AI gravity’ is pulling you toward dependency. Here’s how to push back

As businesses pull out all the stops to integrate artificial intelligence tools into mainstream workflows and business practices, they may be overlooking the longer-term implications of widespread AI use on institutional knowledge and critical thinking.

Eric So, a professor of global economics and behavioral science at the MIT Sloan School of Management, believes that AI is changing the way people’s brains operate, creating a trap where users become overly dependent on the technology, with potentially serious ramifications for business.

“We are increasingly deferring tasks that our brains are meant to handle to AI systems that think for us, write for us, and create on our behalf,” said So, presenting recently as part of the MIT Sloan speaker series, “AI + X: How AI Is Changing Management Practice.”

“Each time we engage in this sort of cognitive outsourcing, we’re participating in dramatic societal change” — one that shouldn’t be taken lightly, said So, who addresses those changes in depth in his forthcoming book, “The Collision: What AI Does to Us.”

“We need to do as much as we can to preserve our capabilities, to recognize when these tools are wrong, to understand when they are missing something, and to be able to take action when these systems fail,” he said.

3 factors leading to worker overreliance on AI

So cited three behavioral trends that are leading to an overreliance on AI, with possible lasting repercussions.

“The combination and confluence of these factors lead to ‘AI gravity’ — the constant pull and push to outsource more of our thinking to AI in order to become more efficient,” So said.

When workers become overreliant on AI, there’s a risk of significant skills collapse, which could eventually undermine individual learning patterns and derail business goals, he said.

In a preliminary MIT Media Lab study, 83% of participants who wrote essays using ChatGPT couldn’t quote a single sentence from what they’d submitted moments earlier. “It passed from the computer screen onto the homework assignment without ever entering their brain,” So said.

More broadly, those effects can mean that tacit institutional knowledge — the material people learn from experience and years of practice — is at risk, especially among the younger members of the workforce. “As we lose practice with the hands-on work and problem-solving that build deep expertise, we naturally lose some of that skill associated with it,” So said. “It’s a real threat to organizations that thrive on continuity.”

How to protect cognitive capital in your organization

So makes the case that businesses need to be intentional about preserving their institutional cognitive capital, by taking strategic action to raise awareness of the issues and effectively recalibrate AI use.

He shared four recommendations for managing AI gravity — for individuals and their teams alike:

AI itself isn’t the real danger. It’s the mindset it promotes among users who unwittingly become “ventriloquist dummies” for the technology, So said.

“To thrive in the age of AI, we have to distinguish between the tools we use and the capabilities we possess,” he said. “If we can’t think without these machines, I would argue we are not thinking at all.”

Eric So is the Sloan Distinguished Professor of Global Economics and Behavioral Science at the MIT Sloan School of Management, faculty co-director of the AI Executive Academy, faculty chair of MIT Sloan's PhD program, and lead faculty for the MIT Sloan Generative AI for Teaching and Learning hub. His current research portfolio spans interconnected topics, including artificial intelligence, behavioral economics, human-computer interactions, and regulatory policy. His book “The Collision: What AI Does to Us” will be published in October 2026.