We must reject any notion of AI consciousness
Anil Seth is right to point out that to overestimate artificial intelligence is to underestimate ourselves (Once again we are told AI may be conscious – I study consciousness, and I have my doubts, 15 July). But he is wrong only to have doubts about whether AI systems like Claude may become conscious. He should be certain, and should say so more forcefully.
It’s not like anything to be Claude, just as it’s not like anything to be a washing machine. An academic education is not required to realise that, common sense will do. Artificial intelligence systems won’t become conscious for the same reason they won’t become pregnant; they’re not that sort of thing.
Used well, Claude is of great benefit. But because it can simulate having experience doesn’t mean it actually has it. Like Richard Dawkins, Seth seems merely to be unsure about this. Such tepid equivocation from leading figures in the field is disappointing; only resounding rejection will do.Dr John PickeringLeamington Spa, Warwickshire
Related Stories
AI News
What if remote work—or the millennial boss
48 minutes ago
AI News
NSA Leverages White House Directives to Gain Access to AI
50 minutes ago
AI News
Google AI Releases Gemini 3.5 Transcribe: A Speech-to
50 minutes ago
AI News
Universities Are Cloning Their Professors With AI
50 minutes ago
AI News
THE CLAUDE WAR | AI, Arms & the First Amendment: How Anthropic Took on the Pentagon and Won
50 minutes ago
AI News
Looking beyond natural sequences
1 hour ago
AI News
IBM Brings AI
1 hour ago
AI News
Pentagon’s blacklisting of Anthropic was unlawful, US judge rules
1 hour ago