Building a Defense-in
The use of artificial intelligence in biology offers great promise but could also endanger global health and national security. In this report, the authors develop a layered mitigation strategy that is robust against a variety of threat scenarios. The authors examine the strengths and weaknesses of a network of nine mitigations, describe areas of mutual reinforcement, and propose next steps for decisionmakers.
Building a Defense-in-Depth Biosecurity Strategy for the AI Era
Steph Guerra, Aurelia Attal-Juncqua, John P. Tarangelo, Casey Aveggio, Katie Dammer, David Glickstein
The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and biology offers great promise for medicine and public health, including the potential to yield transformative societal benefits. Yet this same convergence could introduce serious global health and national security risks. As capabilities continue to advance, AI-enabled biotechnology might lower the technical, operational, and motivational barriers to creating biological weapons. It might also enable high-consequence attacks involving enhanced or novel pathogens. The dual-use nature of biotechnology requires proactive mitigation measures to counter these threats.
In this report, the authors develop a defense-in-depth mitigation strategy that is robust, complementary, and deployable across a wide variety of threat scenarios. To create the strategy, the authors assessed the capabilities of various actor types across different steps of the bioweapon-development pathway prior to an attack, from ideation to weaponization. They also examined how different mitigations could add friction to primary milestones that nefarious actors must bypass to successfully execute an attack using AI-enabled biological weapons.
The authors describe a network of nine mitigations, each with their own strengths and weaknesses and areas of mutual reinforcement, and propose next steps for how decisionmakers in the public and private sectors can work collaboratively to advance this strategy.
This research was independently initiated and conducted by the Center on AI, Security, and Technology within RAND Global and Emerging Risks using income from operations and gifts and grants from philanthropic supporters.
This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
Related Stories
AI News
Casino Capitalism: Inside the financial architecture powering the AI boom
53 minutes ago
AI News
Anthropic blocks possible attempt to use AI to make biological weapons
53 minutes ago
AI News
Artificial Intelligence: Back office benefits
2 hours ago
AI News
Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon resigns, warns AI could ‘kill us all by the end of the decade’: ‘
3 hours ago
AI News
Enflame shares soar 188% on Shanghai debut as Nvidia challenger taps AI fever
3 hours ago
AI News
Anthropic flags five Claude AI uses linked to biological weapons research
3 hours ago
AI News
Anthropic claims Claude AI used for missile projects, global espionage
4 hours ago
AI News
Anthropic details bad actors’ efforts to misuse its AI for bioweapons
4 hours ago